Babinski sign- Mechanism & other Babinski like responses.
The Babinski sign
This eponym refers to the dorsiflexion of the great toe with or without fanning of the other toes and withdrawal of the leg, on plantar stimulation in patients with pyramidal tract dysfunction.
The characteristic response is dorsiflexion of the great toe by recruitment of extensor hallucis longus (EHL) muscle.
The art of elicitation:
The reflexogenic area for the plantar reflex is the first sacral (S1) dermatome with the receptor nerve endings being located in the skin. The afferent nerve is the tibial nerve, the spinal cord segments involved in the reflex arc being 4th and 5th lumbar and 1st and 2nd sacral.
The reflexogenic area for the plantar reflex is the first sacral (S1) dermatome with the receptor nerve endings being located in the skin. The afferent nerve is the tibial nerve, the spinal cord segments involved in the reflex arc being 4th and 5th lumbar and 1st and 2nd sacral.
Position
All the leg muscles should be visible and in a relaxed state. This can be achieved by positioning the patient in a way that the knee is slightly flexed and the thigh is externally rotated. The patient should be warned that the sole is going to be scratched and ask him to try to let his limb remain as floppy as possible. The toes should not be touched at all.
All the leg muscles should be visible and in a relaxed state. This can be achieved by positioning the patient in a way that the knee is slightly flexed and the thigh is externally rotated. The patient should be warned that the sole is going to be scratched and ask him to try to let his limb remain as floppy as possible. The toes should not be touched at all.
Stimulation Any part of the leg can be stimulated, but the best technique is to stimulate the lateral plantar surface and the transverse arch in a single movement upto the middle metatarsophalangeal joint with a firm applicator lasting 5 to 6 seconds. Difficulties are bound to arise in certain clinical situations which makes elicitation and interpretation of plantar response inconclusive. It is imperative that one realises these problems and be aware of their solutions in order to arrive at an appropriate clinical conclusion [Table II].
Interpretation of the response
The plantar response may be:
1. Normal flexor plantar response
2. Pathologic or abnormal extensor plantar response (Babinski’s sign)
The plantar response may be:
1. Normal flexor plantar response
2. Pathologic or abnormal extensor plantar response (Babinski’s sign)
Normal flexor plantar response
In normal people after infancy, there is a plantar flexion of the foot and toes along with adduction of the toes. The primary movement is a plantar flexion of the great toe at the metatarsophalangeal joint, even if the terminal joint appears to extend. The response is a fairly rapid one and may be accompanied at times by an associated flexion of the hip and knee on the stimulated side.
Abnormal extensor plantar response (Babinski’s sign)
The Babinski’s sign is encountered in patients with pyramidal tract dysfunction and is characterised by a dorsiflexion or extension of the great toe with or without fanning or abduction of the other toes. The fully developed response is also accompanied by dorsiflexion of the ankle and flexion of the hip and knee joint and slight abduction of the thigh, leading to a withdrawal of the leg on plantar stimulation.
The Babinski sign is always pathological. There is no such thing as a negative Babinski sign.
mechanism:
In most mammals the limbs are automatically retracted on painful stimulation as a defence reflex, which is more pronounced in hind limbs. Sherrington called it, the flexion reflex synergy, because activation of all muscles effected shortening of the limb; the toe extensors forming part of this shortening synergy. Confusion has arisen from the application of the term extensor plantar response to a movement which forms part of a flexion synergy of the lower limbs. The toe 'extensors' although named extensors by anatomists, are infact flexors in a physiological sense because their action is to shorten the limb and contract reflexly along with other flexor muscles.
The Babinski sign may be a normal occurrence in the first year of life. In the infant, before myelination of the nervous system is complete and an upright stance has been achieved, the normal plantar response is extensor, due to a brisker ‘flexion synergy’as part of the withdrawal response to pain. As the nervous system matures and the pyramidal tracts gain more control over spinal motor neurons, the ‘flexion synergy’ becomes less brisk and the toe ‘extensors’ are no longer a part of it. When the child assumes an upright posture, the plantar response becomes part of the postural reflex maintaining the tones of the foot and leg. At this time, the normal response to stimulation becomes a flexor movement of the toes and the ‘withdrawal extensor’ movement is suppressed by the influence of the pyramidal tract over the spinal reflex arc. The toe then goes down instead of up, as a result of a segmental reflex involving small foot muscles and the overlying skin.This is considered to be normal in adults and is termed - flexor plantar response. With lesions of the pyramidal system, structural or functional, this segmental downward response of the toes disappears, the flexion synergy may become disinhibited and the EHL muscle is again recruited into the flexion reflex of the leg producing the sign of 'Babinski'. The pyramidal tract thus maintains a suppressor action on the ‘flexion reflex’synergy. Pyramidal tract dysfunction however, allows the response to revert to the withdrawal movement by releasing or facilitating the ‘flexion reflex synergy’ of which contraction of the extensor hallucis longus muscle forms an integral part. A Babinski sign can appear only if the intraspinal pathways of the ‘flexion reflex synergy’are operative, however severe the motor deficit in the foot. The motor neurons of the
leg muscles are laminated into separate columns within the anterior horns of the cord, each of which supply proximal or distal flexor or extensor muscles. Both structural as well as functional lesions of the pyramidal tract fibres projecting onto the lumbosacral anterior horn cells and interneurons supplying the leg muscles subserving the ‘flexion reflex synergy’ can release the
Babinski sign. Reversible pathophysiologic conditions result in, or produce, a transient extensor plantar response.Structural lesions produce more lasting effects
leg muscles are laminated into separate columns within the anterior horns of the cord, each of which supply proximal or distal flexor or extensor muscles. Both structural as well as functional lesions of the pyramidal tract fibres projecting onto the lumbosacral anterior horn cells and interneurons supplying the leg muscles subserving the ‘flexion reflex synergy’ can release the
Babinski sign. Reversible pathophysiologic conditions result in, or produce, a transient extensor plantar response.Structural lesions produce more lasting effects
The muscles taking part in a fully developed response include extensor hallucis longus, tibialis anterior, extensor digitorum longus, hamstring group of muscles and tensor faciae latae. The characteristic response is dorsiflexion (extension) of the [big toe], which precedes all other movements. It is followed by fanning out and extension of the other toes, dorsiflexion of the ankle and flexion of the hip and knee joint. This response represents 'positive' Babinski sign. There is no such thing as a 'negative' Babinski sign.
The dorsiflexion of the toes may be the only visible effect, but the contraction of the thigh and leg muscles is always present and can be detected by palpation. Contraction of the tensor fasciae
latae has been referred to as Brissaud’s reflex.
So the fully developed extensor plantar response forms part of the primitive ‘flexion reflex synergy’ of the lower limbs designed to withdraw the limb from a painful stimulus.
This spinal defence reflex mechanism described by Sherrington, activates all the muscles involved in
shortening the stimulated limb. It involves flexion of the hip and knee, dorsiflexion of the ankle and extension of the great toe. The ‘toe and foot extensors’ although named extensors by anatomists, are in fact flexor in a physiological sense, because their action is to shorten the limb and
contract reflexly along with other flexor muscles. The physiologist looks on the Babinski sign as simply a part of the ‘primitive flexion reflex’.
The function of the pyramidal tract may not only be disturbed by structural lesions of myelin sheaths, axons, or both, but also by non-neurological conditions [Table I].latae has been referred to as Brissaud’s reflex.
So the fully developed extensor plantar response forms part of the primitive ‘flexion reflex synergy’ of the lower limbs designed to withdraw the limb from a painful stimulus.
This spinal defence reflex mechanism described by Sherrington, activates all the muscles involved in
shortening the stimulated limb. It involves flexion of the hip and knee, dorsiflexion of the ankle and extension of the great toe. The ‘toe and foot extensors’ although named extensors by anatomists, are in fact flexor in a physiological sense, because their action is to shorten the limb and
contract reflexly along with other flexor muscles. The physiologist looks on the Babinski sign as simply a part of the ‘primitive flexion reflex’.
Types of Babinski sign
a) Minimal Babinski sign : Contraction of hamstring muscles and tensor faciae latae.
b) True Babinski sign : Includes all the components of the fully developed extensor plantar reflex.
c) Pseudo Babinski sign : One may encounter this type of response in sensitive individuals, plantar hyperaesthesia, and choreo-athetosis due to hyperkinesis. True Babinski can be clinically distinguished from the false Babinski by the contraction of hamstring muscles in the former, and failure to inhibit the extensor response by pressure over the base of the great toe. The true Babinski sign is reproducible, unlike voluntary withdrawal of the toes.
d) Exaggerated Babinski sign : It can either be in the form of 'flexor spasm' or 'extensor spasm', depending upon the muscles i.e. whether flexors or extensors, have excess of tone. Flexor spasms occur in spinal cord disease, bilateral upper motor neuron lesion at a supraspinal level, multiple sclerosis and subacute combined degeneration of the cord, while 'extensor spasm' occurs in patients with corticospinal tract lesion when the posterior column function is normal.
e) Inversion of plantar reflex : If the short flexors of the toe are paralysed or flexor tendons are severed accidentally, an extensor response may be obtained.
f) Tonic Babinski reflex : Characterised by slow prolonged contraction of extensors of toe, seen in frontal lobe lesions and extrapyramidal involvement.
g) Crossed extensor response/bilateral Babinski sign : Unilateral stimulation produces bilateral
Babinski in patients with bilateral cerebral disease and spinal cord disease.
Babinski in patients with bilateral cerebral disease and spinal cord disease.
h) Spontaneous Babinski : In infants and children following manipulation of the foot, and in patients with extensive pyramidal tract diseases, passive extension of the knee or passive flexion of the hip and the knee, may produce a positive Babinski sign.
Alternate methods The late 19th and early 20th century was abound with disclaimers associated with founders of new reflex movements of the great toe. These movements are known by the term 'Babinski like responses'. These responses can be elicited by the following techniques, each with its own eponym.
- Chaddock's sign:The extension of the big toe may be obtained by stimulating the dorsal lateral aspect of the foot from the posterior portion of the skin beneath the external malleolis anteriorly along the external edge of the foot.
- Gordon's sign: squeezing the calf muscle
- Oppenheim sign: applying pressure along the shin of tibia
- Gonda's sign: pressing the 4th toe downwards and then releasing it with a snap
- Stransky sign: vigorous adduction of the little toe followed by its sudden release
- Schaefer's sign: squeezing the Achilles tendon
- Rossolimo's sign: flexion of the toes, on quick percussion of the tips of the patients toes with the finger tip
- Mendal Bechtrew sign: flexion of the four outer toes induced by tapping the dorsum of the foot in the region of cuboid bone
- Bing's sign: giving multiple pinpricks on dorsolateral surface of the foot
- Moniz sign: forceful passive plantar flexion of the ankle
- Throckmortan sign: pressing over the dorsal aspect of the metatarsophalangeal joint of the great toe
- Strumpell sign: application of forceful pressure over anterior tibial region
- Cornell sign: scratching the dorsum of the foot along the inner side of the extensor tendon of the great toe
- plantar flexion and fanning of the toes on tapping the mid plantar region of the foot or base of the heel.
Most of these signs imply an increase in the reflexogenous zone and denote responses from different parts of the receptive field. When sufficiently facilitated, the reflex may be elicited by other stimuli as well. Infact, in extreme cases of UMN deficit, the complete ‘flexion reflex’ may be exhibited spontaneously and continuously; the patient lies in bed, the hip and knee flexed, and the ankle and great toe dorsiflexed. In other cases of severe UMN deficit, almost any unpleasant stimulus, such as scratching, pinching, or pricking, will evoke the ‘flexion reflex’, even when applied as high as the thigh, far from the usual reflexogenous zone.
Fallacies
An extensor response may be present when there is no damage to the pyramidal tract. A possible explanation being the excitation of the distal motor neurons and inhibition of the impulses via flexor reflex afferent
nerve fibres can be dissociated because they are mediated by different neurons, however closely linked. On the contrary, cases with proven damage to the pyramidal system have had normal plantar response. We should understand that corticospinal fibres not only originate in different parts of the cortex, but also have different terminations. Babinski sign can be expected only when 'leg fibres' of the pyramidal tract are involved. Plantar areflexia can be noted in cases with loss of sensation of sole due to lesion of the first sacral cutaneous distribution. The same can be observed in paralysis of extensors or long flexors of great toe. In spinal shock, cessation of tonic discharge of spinal neurons by excitatory impulses in descending pathways may explain its non existence. Drugs like parenteral physostigmine in physiological doses may also abolish a plantar response.
An extensor response may be present when there is no damage to the pyramidal tract. A possible explanation being the excitation of the distal motor neurons and inhibition of the impulses via flexor reflex afferent
nerve fibres can be dissociated because they are mediated by different neurons, however closely linked. On the contrary, cases with proven damage to the pyramidal system have had normal plantar response. We should understand that corticospinal fibres not only originate in different parts of the cortex, but also have different terminations. Babinski sign can be expected only when 'leg fibres' of the pyramidal tract are involved. Plantar areflexia can be noted in cases with loss of sensation of sole due to lesion of the first sacral cutaneous distribution. The same can be observed in paralysis of extensors or long flexors of great toe. In spinal shock, cessation of tonic discharge of spinal neurons by excitatory impulses in descending pathways may explain its non existence. Drugs like parenteral physostigmine in physiological doses may also abolish a plantar response.
» Conclusion
Despite the continuing controversy and observer bias, clinical utility of Babinski sign remains unchallenged. The role of pyramidal system in the pathophysiology of this sign is quite clear. Pyramidal tract dysfunction releases the flexion reflex synergy, of which contraction of the extensor hallucis longus muscle forms an integral part. The most important and vital question in interpreting the plantar response is not, whether the great toe goes up or not, but is whether an upgoing toe is pathological or not. For an appropriate answer the method of observation is much more important than the method of elicitation.
